I Don’t Regret Ordering Police to Shoot Protesters in the Leg, Ruto Says on Al Jazeera

President William Ruto has defended his controversial remarks instructing police to shoot protesters in the leg, calling the action necessary to maintain law and order.

In an interview with Al Jazeera published on Sunday, Ruto dismissed accusations that his government is using the police to suppress dissent, insisting that security forces operate within the law.

“I do not regret those comments at all because the law allows the police to use force when other people’s lives are in danger,” Ruto stated.

“The police know what they need to do and understand their purview.”

The President emphasized that his orders were meant to protect both citizens and property, ensuring that protesters’ rights are respected while preventing chaos.

Ruto also clarified that the National Police Service (NPS) functions independently. He stated that his comments were not direct instructions but reflected his stance on public safety. 

“The police are independent, and there is nowhere in the law where I have the power to direct the police,” he explained.

Despite criticism from sections of the media describing his administration as rogue, Ruto maintained that the press has the freedom to express opinions.

“The media are independent, and they write what they think. I may not agree with everything, but they have the right to say it,” he said.

The President also spoke about recent cases of alleged police misconduct, including the death of teacher and activist Albert Ojawang’, reiterating the government’s commitment to discipline and accountability.

“We have thousands of police officers, and occasionally there are rogue elements. That is why laws exist to deal with them. We will continue ensuring that the majority of officers know what to do,” Ruto said.

Earlier this year, during the launch of the Police Housing Project at Kilimani Police Station, Ruto warned that anyone attempting to storm businesses or police stations should be shot in the leg before being taken to court.

“Anyone deciding to storm a person’s business or a police station should be shot in the leg. Thereafter, they can go to court,” he said in July.

The remarks sparked national debate. Human rights groups condemned them as excessive force, while supporters argued the directive was necessary to prevent anarchy.

Throughout the interview, Ruto stressed that public safety remains a top priority. He highlighted that the government seeks to balance law enforcement with citizens’ rights, particularly during protests targeting government offices or private businesses.

“The police must ensure that people can protest safely without harming others or destroying property,” he added.

The President’s firm stance comes amid increasing reports of violent protests in major cities, where clashes between demonstrators and security forces have led to injuries and property damage.

Ruto’s statements continue to divide opinion in Kenya. Critics argue that authorizing police to shoot protesters, even in the leg, could lead to abuse and human rights violations.

Supporters, however, believe that his directive is a practical approach to prevent vandalism and ensure order.

Media coverage has also focused on the independence of the press and police, questioning whether such statements could influence law enforcement practices. Ruto, however, reaffirmed that both institutions operate independently and are governed by law.

The President concluded by reiterating that while law enforcement must remain strict, it is equally important to ensure accountability for rogue officers.

“Our priority is to maintain peace and order, while making sure those who violate the law are held responsible,” he said.

Olale Walter

Kevin, an experienced news author, provides clear, global insights.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form